Data Connectivity & Mainframe Inegration

Data Services Journal

Subscribe to Data Services Journal: eMailAlertsEmail Alerts newslettersWeekly Newsletters
Get Data Services Journal: homepageHomepage mobileMobile rssRSS facebookFacebook twitterTwitter linkedinLinkedIn


Data Services Authors: Scott Allen, Jacob Spencer, Reza Koohrang, Tony Shan, Charlie Clark

Related Topics: Data Services Journal, Wireless Technology Magazine, Big Data on Ulitzer, Internet of Things Journal

BigData: Blog Post

Difference Between Data Sheet Transmit Power & Data Stream Transmit Power | @ThingsExpo #IoT

Data Sheet Transmit Power & Data Stream Transmit Power

You need to link a two production sites together in your IIoT network in order to move critical voice, video, data and sensor data (VVDSTM) between the sites by deploying access points. So, you consider using industrial Wi-Fi Access Points to implement this short-haul, point-to-point (PTP) RF link between the two sites. Short-haul RF links out to 8 miles are very doable using industrial Wi-Fi Access Points with directional antennas.

You evaluate potential Wi-Fi Access Points from their data sheet specs. This is given, and you select one.

Header Image

Image courtesy of Flickr Creative Commons

Now, there is one specification that is commonly misunderstood and leads to confusion when evaluating MIMO capable Wi-Fi Access Points and using them in either PTP or point-to-multipoint (PMP) IIoT networks as wireless infrastructure.

Confusion and mistakes arise from the difference between the transmit power stated on the product data sheet and the transmit power of a single MIMO data stream of the Access Point.

For example, a 3×3 MIMO Access Point data sheet states the transmit power is 27dBm for MCS4/12/20 data encoding in either the 2.4 or 5GHz band.

This is typical, and not a surprise, but what is this transmit power really stating.

The FCC limits and regulates maximum transmit power from an intentional emitter, e.g. Wi-Fi Access Points. For Wi-Fi devices, the limits apply to the aggregate transmit power of the device. In above product spec example, the transmit power stated is the aggregate transmit power for the 3 MIMO data streams.

Still good? Yes. You have a Wi-Fi Access Point and the total transmit power is 27dBm.

Now, you design your short-haul PTP link using Wi-Fi Access Points and directional antennas.

What transmit power do you use in your RF link budget?

27dBm since it is the transmit power for the Access Point for the data encoding and the band you plan to use. Right?

No.

While 27dBm is the total aggregate transmit power for the Access Point, it is not the transmit power of an individual data stream. The individual data stream transmit power is roughly 5dB less than the aggregate transmit power found in the data sheet for a 3×3 MIMO product.

Difference in Transmit Power versus Aggregate Power

  • 1 Data Stream transmitting at 22dBm    -  Aggregate Transmit Power is 22dBm
  • 2 Data Streams transmitting at 22dBm  -  Aggregate Transmit Power is 25dBm
  • 3 Data Streams transmitting at 22dBm  -  Aggregate Transmit Power is 27dBm

So here it is...

If you use the transmit power from the data sheet in your RF link calculation without correction, your actual link distance will be approximately half what you expect for the planned fade margin or the link reliability will be less than what you expect for the planned link distance.

When designing RF links for the IIoT networks, make certain you are using the correct transmit power in your RF link budget calculations.

More Stories By Scott Allen

Scott is an executive leader with more than 25 years of experience in product lifecycle management, product marketing, business development, and technology deployment. He offers a unique blend of start-up aggressiveness and established company executive leadership, with expertise in product delivery, demand generation, and global market expansion. As CMO of FreeWave, Scott is responsible for product life cycle/management, GTM execution, demand generation, and brand creation/expansion strategies.

Prior to joining FreeWave, Scott held executive management positions at Fluke Networks (a Danaher Company), Network Associates (McAfee), and several start-ups including Mazu Networks and NEXVU Business Solutions. Scott earned his BA in Computer Information Systems from Weber University.